Struthiomimus - Facts and Figures

Name: Struthiomimus (Greek for ostrich mimic); pronounced STROO-thee-oh-MIME-us Habitat: Plains of western North America Historical Period: Late Cretaceous (75 million years ago) Size and Weight: About 10 feet long and 300 pounds Diet: Plants and meat Distinguishing Characteristics: Ostrich-like posture; long tail and hind legs About Struthiomimus A close relative of Ornithomimus, which it closely resembled, Struthiomimus (ostrich mimic) galloped across the plains of western North America during the late Cretaceous period. This ornithomimid (bird mimic) dinosaur was distinguished from its more famous cousin by its slightly longer arms and stronger fingers, but because of the position of its thumbs it couldnt grasp food quite as easily. Like other ornithomimids, Struthiomimus likely pursued an opportunistic diet, feeding on plants, small animals, insects, fish or even carrion (when a kill was left unattended by other, larger theropods). This dinosaur may have been capable of short sprints of 50 miles per hour, but had a less taxing cruising speed in the 30 to 40 mph range.

Analysis Of Hogg And Vaughn ( 2008 ) - 1273 Words

Hogg and Vaughn (2008) proposed that paralinguistic features used to communicate a message between sender and receiver, would impact on how the message was interpreted by the audience. When performing my presentation to the class, my verbal communication needed to be clear and concise to get an accurate message to the receiver. In order to achieve this, I needed to speak at an appropriate volume, so not to shout at the audience, conveying an aggressive form of communication but also not to be coy so that I could not be heard. In conjunction with volume, the pitch and pace at which I communicated was also important. However, due to being nervous, I spoke with a high pitch, low volume and at a fast pace. This had a negative impact on how the information was communicated to the audience. It exerted anxiety and urgency from the sender to the receiver, which caused a barrier to communication. In reflection of this experience, I have learnt that by controlling my verbal communication, I can converse with confidence and ensure a clear message is received. A leader is a person who strives to achieve goals by influencing people towards success. I feel I was a natural leader within the group, adopting House’s Path Goal Theory – Four Leadership Style. House (1975) stated that the behaviour of a leader is important for good performance. My main roles as a leader were to co-ordinate and motivate my group to meet deadlines and goals and to support members when giving ideas contributingShow MoreRelatedStephen P. Robbins Timothy A. Judge (2011) Organizational Behaviour 15th Edition New Jersey: Prentice Hall393164 Words   |  1573 PagesPetersen Senior Art Director: Janet Slowik Art Director: Kenny Beck Text and Cover Designer: Wanda Espana OB Poll Graphics: Electra Graphics Cover Art: honey comb and a bee working / Shutterstock / LilKar Sr. Media Project Manager, Editorial: Denise Vaughn Media Project Manager, Production: Lisa Rinaldi Full-Service Project Management: Christian Holdener, S4Carlisle Publishing Services Composition: S4Carlisle Publishing Services Printer/Binder: Courier/Kendallville Cover Printer: Courier/KendalvilleRead MoreQuality Improvement328284 Words   |  1314 Pagesof Mechanical Engineering, and was Director of the Program in Industrial Engineering. Dr. Montgomery has research and teaching interests in engineering statistics including statistical quality-control techniques, design of experiments, regression analysis and empirical model building, and the application of operations research methodology to problems in manufacturing systems. He has authored and coauthored more than 190 technical papers in these fields and is the author of twelve other books. Dr.Read MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 PagesMichael Fruhbeis Permissions Project Manager: Shannon Barbe Manager, Cover Visual Research Permissions: Karen Sanatar Manager Central Design: Jayne Conte Cover Art: Getty Images, Inc. Cover Design: Suzanne Duda Lead Media Project Manager: Denise Vaughn Full-Service Project Management: Sharon Anderson/BookMasters, Inc. Composition: Integra Software Services Printer/Binder: Edwards Brothers Cover Printer: Coral Graphics Text Font: 10/12 Weidemann-Book Credits and acknowledgments borrowed from other

Pressure Groups free essay sample

A pressure group is an association that may be formal or informal, whose purpose it is to further the interests of a specific section of society or to promote a particular cause. Pressure groups normally fall under 3 classifications, sectional which represent a specific section of the public, e. g. Age UK, promotion which promotes a particular cause, e. g. Greenpeace and finally dual-function who are a combination of both sectional and promotional, e. g. Countryside Alliance. Pressure groups can also be either insider groups which means that they have a close relationship with the government and have regular consultation with them and also take part in the decision-making process, e. g. National Farmers Union, British Medical Association and Confederation of Business Industries or they can be outsider groups which means they have little to no relationship with the government and influence government through public opinion. There are also aspiring outsider groups like the British Association of Drivers who wish to become insiders. One type of pressure group is a sectional pressure group. These types of groups represent a specific section of society and therefore they are self-interested of their own members. For example, Age UK is a sectional pressure group as it represents the interests of the elderly. Sectional pressure groups are also known as interest groups. Another type of pressure group is promotional groups. These groups seek to promote a particular cause or issues in society. As a result, they claim that they serve the whole community. Promotional pressure groups are also altruistic as the members do not need to be from a specific section of the public. Examples of a promotional pressure group are environmental groups such as Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth. One function of a pressure group is that they have an educative function. This is because they help to inform and educate the public as well as the government about politically important issues. For example, Friends of the Earth publicise environmental issues. Another function of a pressure group is that it provides the public with a form of tension release. This is because pressure groups allow people to express their interests and their concerns. For example, the Occupy Movement enabled many people to protest against the excesses of the financial world. One more function of a pressure group is that it provides a less intensive but relative opportunity for political participation. This is because the public can voice their interests without making any major commitments. For example, Taxpayers’ Alliance organise online petitions, enabling people to make their views known without such commitments. One reason why a pressure group is different from a political party is due to the fact that pressure groups only seek to influence the government, they do not seek governmental power unlike political parties. Another difference is that pressure groups are not accountable to their members for their actions whereas political parties are. This is also means that pressure groups can undertake acts of civil disobedience whereas pressure groups cannot. Also pressure groups usually have a narrow range of issues whereas political parties adopt policies across full range of government responsibility. Sectional pressure groups represent a specific section of society whereas promotional pressure groups promote a particular cause or issues. For example, Age UK is a sectional group so represents the interests of the elderly and Greenpeace is a promotional group as it promotes environmental issues. Furthermore, sectional pressure groups are self-interested, in that they are concerned with promoting the best interests of their members whereas promotional pressure groups are altruistic, in that they claim to be serving the interests of the whole community as they often do not have a specific membership. Insider pressure groups operate inside the political system through contacts with ministers, MPs, peers and officials whereas outsider pressure groups have no special links with government. For example, the Confederation of British Industry is an insider pressure group as it is regularly consulted by the government. An example of an outsider group is Greenpeace who operate outside of the political system. In addition to this, insider pressure groups take part in the development of a policy; therefore they can influence decisions directly whereas outsider pressure groups influence decision makers by mobilising public opinion. For example, the National Farmers Union helps shape agriculture policy because it is in insider, whereas outsider groups such as Age UK influence decisions by showing decision-makers that they command widespread interests and in this case, the ‘grey-vote’ It is sometimes difficult to distinguish between a pressure group and a party because both may put candidates for elections. For example in the 2010, election, single-issue parties such as Animals Count and the Senior Citizens Party offered the electorate a few alternative candidates. In addition to this, Anti-abortion group have presented candidates in general elections to publicise their cause. In addition, some pressure groups may be converting themselves to parties. Furthermore, it may also be difficult to distinguish because some single-issue parties resemble pressure groups. For example, UKIP began as an anti-European pressure group, while the Green Party was little more than once an environmental campaign organisation. The BNP is also essentially an anti-immigration organisation. Some pressure groups, notably Trade Unions adopt a wide range of policies and so appear quite similar to parties. Some pressure groups also work so closely with parties and government that it becomes too difficult to distinguish their roles. For example, Unlock Democracy, which campaigns for constitutional reform is closely allied with the Liberal Democrats. Many Trade Unions also have a close link with Labour.

Website Comparison free essay sample

An examination of two websites for effectiveness and content. Two websites http://www.uspa.org/ and http://www.capitalone.com/ are compared as to their very different intentions. The first is a non-profit organization providing information for skydivers. The other is a commercial site run by a credit company. This paper explores the different methods used by each site to provide information to their users, the effectiveness of each of their strategies and how they may be improved. There is a major difference from both sites due to the goal of being non-profit and for-profit. It can be indicated from the presence of advertisements and the conversational tones. Both sides are very informative in their own way and seem to attempt to be one-stop solution for the readers. USPA provides information inside the site like the news, learn to skydive with the manuals, weather information, safety, the important frequently asked questions forum, clickable and interactive map that connects to local skydiving schools that enables readers to find quick access to the education and still linked nationally. We will write a custom essay sample on Website Comparison or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page It also provides links to other resources, the partnering sites, like the government, online store, competitions and Parachutist Magazine.